{ "id": "94004", "key": "ALOY-80", "fields": { "issuetype": { "id": "4", "description": "An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task.", "name": "Improvement", "subtask": false }, "project": { "id": "11113", "key": "ALOY", "name": "Alloy", "projectCategory": { "id": "10400", "description": "Tools for developing applications", "name": "Tooling" } }, "fixVersions": [ { "id": "14036", "description": "2012 Sprint 14", "name": "2012 Sprint 14", "archived": true, "released": true, "releaseDate": "2012-07-19" } ], "resolution": { "id": "1", "description": "A fix for this issue is checked into the tree and tested.", "name": "Fixed" }, "resolutiondate": "2012-07-19T11:52:03.000+0000", "created": "2012-06-27T12:26:23.000+0000", "priority": { "name": "High", "id": "2" }, "labels": [], "versions": [ { "id": "14036", "description": "2012 Sprint 14", "name": "2012 Sprint 14", "archived": true, "released": true, "releaseDate": "2012-07-19" } ], "issuelinks": [], "assignee": { "name": "tlukasavage", "key": "tlukasavage", "displayName": "Tony Lukasavage", "active": true, "timeZone": "America/Los_Angeles" }, "updated": "2014-06-22T13:21:21.000+0000", "status": { "description": "The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are closed can be reopened.", "name": "Closed", "id": "6", "statusCategory": { "id": 3, "key": "done", "colorName": "green", "name": "Done" } }, "components": [ { "id": "12326", "name": "XML", "description": "View XML and parsing" } ], "description": "h2. Description\r\n\r\nRight now, the markup syntax for {{Ti.UI.iPad.SplitWindow}} assumes that it has 2 children, and that each is a {{Ti.UI.Window}}. It also assumes that the first window is the {{masterView}} and that the second is the {{detailView}}. While this convention over configuration may fit for this component, I wanted to throw out a few alternatives to see what others think.\r\n\r\nh2. Alternatives\r\n\r\nh4. Add custom attribute to child windows\r\n{code:xml}\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n{code}\r\n\r\nh4. Enforce IDs of master and detail (I don't like this one, but it's a possibility)\r\n{code:xml}\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n{code}\r\n\r\nh4. Check class for master and detail\r\n{code:xml}\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n{code}\r\n\r\nh4. Use an entirely new markup\r\n{code:xml}\r\n\r\n \r\n