{
"id": "94004",
"key": "ALOY-80",
"fields": {
"issuetype": {
"id": "4",
"description": "An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task.",
"name": "Improvement",
"subtask": false
},
"project": {
"id": "11113",
"key": "ALOY",
"name": "Alloy",
"projectCategory": {
"id": "10400",
"description": "Tools for developing applications",
"name": "Tooling"
}
},
"fixVersions": [
{
"id": "14036",
"description": "2012 Sprint 14",
"name": "2012 Sprint 14",
"archived": true,
"released": true,
"releaseDate": "2012-07-19"
}
],
"resolution": {
"id": "1",
"description": "A fix for this issue is checked into the tree and tested.",
"name": "Fixed"
},
"resolutiondate": "2012-07-19T11:52:03.000+0000",
"created": "2012-06-27T12:26:23.000+0000",
"priority": {
"name": "High",
"id": "2"
},
"labels": [],
"versions": [
{
"id": "14036",
"description": "2012 Sprint 14",
"name": "2012 Sprint 14",
"archived": true,
"released": true,
"releaseDate": "2012-07-19"
}
],
"issuelinks": [],
"assignee": {
"name": "tlukasavage",
"key": "tlukasavage",
"displayName": "Tony Lukasavage",
"active": true,
"timeZone": "America/Los_Angeles"
},
"updated": "2014-06-22T13:21:21.000+0000",
"status": {
"description": "The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are closed can be reopened.",
"name": "Closed",
"id": "6",
"statusCategory": {
"id": 3,
"key": "done",
"colorName": "green",
"name": "Done"
}
},
"components": [
{
"id": "12326",
"name": "XML",
"description": "View XML and parsing"
}
],
"description": "h2. Description\r\n\r\nRight now, the markup syntax for {{Ti.UI.iPad.SplitWindow}} assumes that it has 2 children, and that each is a {{Ti.UI.Window}}. It also assumes that the first window is the {{masterView}} and that the second is the {{detailView}}. While this convention over configuration may fit for this component, I wanted to throw out a few alternatives to see what others think.\r\n\r\nh2. Alternatives\r\n\r\nh4. Add custom attribute to child windows\r\n{code:xml}\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n{code}\r\n\r\nh4. Enforce IDs of master and detail (I don't like this one, but it's a possibility)\r\n{code:xml}\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n{code}\r\n\r\nh4. Check class for master and detail\r\n{code:xml}\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n{code}\r\n\r\nh4. Use an entirely new markup\r\n{code:xml}\r\n\r\n \r\n